Brad Pitt argued that the judge should not be removed from his lengthy custody proceedings with Angelina Jolie.
The Legal Team of “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” actors challenged the recent disqualification of Judge John Uderkirk to the California Supreme Court, effectively admitting a previous ruling in 1957. I disabled it. -More time old star with 5 young children of ex-husband and wife.
The petition argued that the dismissal of the judge “virtually overturned the temporary court system permitted by the Constitution in California,” and now “the parties to the proceedings have been notified for a long time. Also opens the door to the challenge of disqualification at any point during the proceedings. ” It is said to be the reason for disqualification. “
The document added: “By doing so, opinions are guaranteed to fuel disqualified gamemanship and raise serious questions as to whether the temporary judgment system is a viable option in California’s heavily stalled judicial system. increase.”
Angelina’s team sought to dismiss the judge hired in 2016 because he felt the decision was biased because he did not disclose the ongoing or new cases hired by Brad’s lawyer and three judges. Was there. The person who oversaw the hearing on the issue last month agreed with Order Kirk’s “mandatory disclosure failure” about the work he was doing in other cases involving a team of “moneyball” stars. fairness.
However, Brad’s new petition claims that a “maleficent” star with Maddox, 20, Pax, 17, Zahara, 16, Shiro, 15 and 13-year-old twins Knox and Vivienne and Brad was “made.” From the beginning of the custody dispute, he knew the important professional history of Judge Orderkirk with Pitt’s petitioner, but had been waiting for him for years to be dismissed.
The lawyer insisted that: “After more than four years of controversial proceedings, we harmed our children and their fathers every day. Important and considered custody decisions were administrative errors that had nothing to do with the proposal. As a result of the custody dispute itself.
“California law states that parties seeking disqualification of a judge submit a written statement in front of the judge against ongoing proceedings” as soon as possible after discovering the facts that make up the reason for disqualification. ” I’m asking you to.
“If you do not, you will waive or confiscate the rights of the party seeking disqualification.”
Brad’s team confirmed with people seeking a review at the California Supreme Court.
They said in a statement that they wanted a review for the following reasons: Expert. “
Angelina’s team has branded a move to bring the “disturb” back to the judge.
Her lawyer, Robert A. Olsen, said:
“Pitt’s lawyer’s petition to the California Supreme Court shows how they are sticking to this private judge who has shown prejudice and rejected legally necessary evidence.
“Because he fully understands unethical behavior and has not previously disclosed a new ongoing financial relationship with him, Mr. Pitt’s lawyer may seek to return to a private judge. Worryingly, Jolly wants Pitt to join in instead. She focuses on the needs, voice, and healing of her children. “
Brad Pitt urges Supreme Court to consider custody proceedings with Angelina Jolie | Entertainment News
Source link Brad Pitt urges Supreme Court to consider custody proceedings with Angelina Jolie | Entertainment News